Coach and athlete workflows

Prepare and assign

Coaches create exercises and sessions and review programs before publishing. Publication creates an immutable version available in the institution library. Assignment is separate: review selected athletes and confirm.

Follow daily work

Select an assigned athlete to see their program and history. Use groups/calendar for appointments, record attendance and outcomes, and complete tasks. Performance assessments record measurements, not clinical interpretations.

Athlete workflow

Open assigned training, record the actual session and review history. No-assignment states do not invent example workouts. Optional session feedback is a real submitted rating, not an inferred quality score.

Conversations and nutrition

Staff can start authorized private conversations; athletes can read and reply. Groups have linked conversations. Plans differ from actual diaries, and staff diary access requires explicit athlete sharing. Never infer consumption from a plan or treat missing values as zero.

Follow the full workflow

For a coach, a useful path is: review the program and its published version, assign it to the current roster, coordinate events and assessments, review the actual records and create explicit follow-up tasks. Discuss recorded work in the authorised conversation rather than assuming every staff member can read it.

For an athlete, the important distinctions are assigned versus actually completed training, a suggested meal versus recorded food, and a saved draft versus a server-acknowledged record. Optional session feedback is a separate choice. The institution gains a connected operational record only when its people actually maintain these steps; missing entries remain unknown.

Source and scope

Reviewed against the maintained local university branch on 17 October 2026. docs/reference/api.md.